I hope everyone will find this relevant: Stuart Ritchie and colleagues replicated study 9 of Bem's research on "retroactive influence". Between Ritchie and myself I think we explain the potentially confusing research design Bem used, and Ritchie explains how he and his colleagues tried to carefully reproduce the study (with, of course, null results). Interesting comments on why the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology didn't publish his replication as well as his thoughts on the "file drawer" problem, type 1 and 2 errors, etc.
The Interview: http://www.thepsychfiles.com/ep-173-the-first-replication-of-daryl-bems-research-on-psychic-phenomenon/ Here's the concept map which you might find helpful: http://go.comapping.com/comapping.html#mapid=117115&publishKey=mfewzbgeEg Michael Michael A. Britt, Ph.D. [email protected] http://www.ThePsychFiles.com Twitter: mbritt --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected]. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=17450 or send a blank email to leave-17450-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
