I don't think you will have to worry too much. As the subheading of the article 
so aptly puts it (my helpful comment in brackets): "Propaganda [or any 
Manchurian conspiracy to place right-wing crackpots in positions of influence 
in the dominant media] works best when it is not perceived as propaganda, but 
works more subtly." Many times Gladwell must write the exact opposite of what 
he believes just to retain his position of influence in the dominant media. 
Evidently, the conspirators at the National Journalism Center (the 
"corporate-funded program created to counter the media's alleged 'anti-business 
bias' by molding college kids into corporate-friendly journalist-operatives and 
helping them infiltrate top-tier news media organizations") took a different 
route with Gladwell than they did with other graduates/automatons such as 
Dinesh D'Souza, Michelle Malkin, Ann Coulter, John Fund and others who were way 
too obvious in their ideology to make good propagandists.

I'm not sure if it's worse to be a hypocritical ideologue who often expresses 
contrary opinions to hide their ideology or a shill who doesn't really believe 
anything but just does it for the big paycheck but I don't think you can be 
both at the same time. This conspiracy evidently goes all the way to the top 
(of the Association for Psychological Science). It looks like APS is going to 
have to find another popularizer of psychology to feature at its annual 
conference.

Rick

Dr. Rick Froman, Chair
Division of Humanities and Social Sciences
Professor of Psychology
Box 3055
John Brown University
2000 W. University Siloam Springs, AR  72761
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
(479)524-7295
http://bit.ly/DrFroman

From: Marc Carter [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 9:42 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: RE: [tips] Malcolm Gladwell's corporatist right-wing background

Interesting, and depressing.  I just ordered texts for an honors' student 
salon, and one of them is _Outliers_, which, as far as I can tell from reviews 
and the little bit I've read so far, has a message that apparently runs quite 
contrary to the typical right-wing explanation for success: disposition.

I guess I'll know more as I read more, but I'm really sort of sorry, now.  I 
hope none of the corporate-shill stuff comes through in this book....

m

--
Marc Carter, PhD
Associate Professor of Psychology
Chair, Department of Behavioral and Health Sciences
College of Arts & Sciences
Baker University
--

From: Christopher Green [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 3:57 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: [tips] Malcolm Gladwell's corporatist right-wing background


I confess, I have never been as eager to despise Malcolm Gladwell as many other 
behavioral scientists were. Yes, he overblew and misinterpreted some results, 
but he seemed to occupy an important niche in the complex ecology by which 
difficult, nuanced scientific findings get translated to the wider public, 
which isn't much interested in the niceties of neologistic theories and null 
hypothesis testing.

Turns out, I was wrong, but not for the reasons I expected. It appears, now, 
that Malcolm Gladwell is the product of well-known "public relations" machine 
that has defended corporatist agendas and far right politics for nearly three 
decades now. The only difference is, he has been better at keeping his 
paymasters in the shadows than some of his fellow propagandists.

The source is clearly leftist, but the basic facts are clear enough whether you 
are in sympathy with the writer's politics or not.

http://www.alternet.org/story/155770/is_malcolm_gladwell_america%27s_most_successful_propagandist_and_corporate_shill?page=entire

Chris
---
Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
Canada

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://www.yorku.ca/christo/
==========================




---

You are currently subscribed to tips as: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13029.76c7c563b32ad9d8d09c72a2d17c90e1&n=T&l=tips&o=18237

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)

or send a blank email to 
leave-18237-13029.76c7c563b32ad9d8d09c72a2d17c9...@fsulist.frostburg.edu<mailto:leave-18237-13029.76c7c563b32ad9d8d09c72a2d17c9...@fsulist.frostburg.edu>







________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by Baker University ("BU") and is intended to be confidential and for 
the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be 
protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal 
rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please 
immediately notify Baker University by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.

---

You are currently subscribed to tips as: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13039.37a56d458b5e856d05bcfb3322db5f8a&n=T&l=tips&o=18258

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)

or send a blank email to 
leave-18258-13039.37a56d458b5e856d05bcfb3322db5...@fsulist.frostburg.edu<mailto:leave-18258-13039.37a56d458b5e856d05bcfb3322db5...@fsulist.frostburg.edu>







---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=18264
or send a blank email to 
leave-18264-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to