Yes, friends, not only is math hard for Barbie but apparently it is also hard
for biologists.  Some recently published research shows that articles that
have many equations in them get cited less often than those articles without
equations. Unbelievable!  One popular media account of the research is
available here:
http://health.usnews.com/health-news/news/articles/2012/06/26/even-some-scientists-are-math-challenged

The original article appears in PNAS and here is the abstract:
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/06/22/1205259109.abstract?sid=91877d92-d0f9-41d7-8191-3322f01cb540

Quoting from the abstract:

|The density of equations in an article has a significant negative impact
|on citation rates, with papers receiving 28% fewer citations overall for
|each additional equation per page in the main text.

These results are based on articles in journals on ecology and evolution.
I'm sure that these results don't hold for psychologists because we are
a statistically literate and research savvy bunch.

By the way, what did people think of Shin & Raudenbush's article on
"Confidence Bounds and Power for the Reliability of Observational
Measures on the Quality of a Social Setting" in the latest issue of
Psychometrika?

True story: a couple of decades ago in a graduate learning class I used
an article from the Journal of Mathematical Psychology which was an
overview of mathematical theories of learning.  After looking at the sick
look on their faces (indicating that they thought that the article was probably
unreadable because of the math), I said "Cheer up!  At least you can say
that you're actually read an article in the Journal of Math Psych!".
For some reason this did not cheer them up.

-Mike Palij
New York University
[email protected]

P.S. True Story #2:  In graduate school, a fellow grad student in a subarea
that will go unidentified, remarked that when he read a research article,
he read the introduction and discussion and assumed that the researchers
knew what they were doing in the method and results section.  It is this
kind of keen critical curiosity and inquiry that has made psychology what
it is today, IMHO.

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=18651
or send a blank email to 
leave-18651-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to