On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:11:01 -0700, Paul Brandon wrote:
>
>And then there's always Bill Uttal's 'The New Phrenology'.

And then there's Uttal;s 2011 "Mind and Brain".  See:

http://www.amazon.com/Mind-Brain-Appraisal-Cognitive-Neuroscience/dp/026201596X/ref=la_B001HOEDHY_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1341931568&sr=1-1

-Mike Palij
New York University
[email protected]


On Jul 10, 2012, at 7:23 AM, Michael Palij wrote:

> A guest blog on the Scientific American website recounts one neuroscientist's
> issues with the use of neuroimaging, specifically fMRI, as a tool in trying to
> connect cognitive activity to brain activity.  It is written for an
> intelligent lay
> audience and could be used in undergraduate courses (e.g., cognitive psych)
> to illustrate some of the problems associated with the use of neuroimaging.
> The blog can be read here:
> http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2012/07/05/controversial-science-of-brain-imaging/
>
> It uses examples from the research literature, including the infamous salmon
> study by Bennett.

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=18944
or send a blank email to 
leave-18944-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to