A few weeks ago, I was talking to a professor at a near-by flagship 
university about how in the Remembering the Holocaust class I require the 
students wear large yellow stars on their chest with "Jew" boldly written on it 
pinned on their chests outside of class, 24/7, wherever they are and with 
whomever they are, and daily record their feelings and the responses of those 
around them.  Fabulous stuff.  Anyway, back to the point of this encounter, the 
professor's immediate, first, unthinking, knee-jerk response was, "Oh, you must 
have tenure."  That one sentence has had me thinking, especially after reading 
Daniel Gilbert's STUMBLING ON HAPPINESS and some other stuff, that in most 
corners of academe, academics grovel at the feet of the great god, Tenure.  No, 
they don't offer up people to the flames.  But, they often just throw people to 
the wolves.  After all, this deity can provide lots of safety and security, and 
supposedly happiness.  In fact, if Mae West was an academic, she might say, 
"I've been untenured and I've been tenured.  Tenured is better."  

       I know, tenure really isn't the problem.  Threatened people who pursue 
it are.  The demands of that "tenure track" environment are.  You can tell a 
lot about people by how they pursue tenure when demand and threat merge into a 
proverbial "perfect storm."  The problem is that the campus are perennially 
stormy.   The result is that far too many academics practice a fearful 
austerity rather than an heroic audacity.  Cultivation of a sense of well-being 
is not high on their professional bucket list.  They have the fearful look of 
prey being stalked.  They walk around with a defeated heart, a submissive mind, 
and an inner surrender that's all summed up in "what will they think" and "but, 
I don't have tenure."  They are thrown into a survival mode, having a tendency 
to overvalue it, wanting it too much, are willing to make too many compromises, 
are willing to sacrifice values and character to secure it, giving it a 
priority above classroom teaching, sacrificing students, thinking it can do so 
much, and thinking it can do too much.  

        Too many of us are rationalizing academic Tevyes, singing "if I was 
tenured prof."  Oye, the wonderful careers we could have and the great things 
we could do if we were tenured.  It's easy to think that tenure is synonomous 
with "job satisfaction" and happiness; it's easy to think that habits and 
attitudes formed during the years in the pursuit of tenure can be broken the 
day after nailing it down.  So many academics pursuing tenure believe that life 
will be much, much better--and pleasantly different--once they are tenured.  
They assume they can relax from the judgment of others, have the freedom they 
desire to do the things that most interest them, and they will have job 
security in an insecure world. Guess what.  They have what Gilbert calls an 
"impact bias."  That makes them lousy forecasters, and dead wrong.  After that 
one ray briefly breaks through the dark clouds, the hole closes to gray the sky 
once again.  And, it is that error that makes our campuses perpetual 
risk-aversion, fearful places.  

        A little secret that not really a secret:   getting tenure will make 
you "happy," but not all that much and not for that long.  Deny it all you 
want; rationalize it away all you want.  Close your eyes, put your fingers 
tightly in your ears, and make a wish for it to go away.  But, it won't go 
away.  The protracted stalking, threatening, cowering, and withering pressures 
are still there and quickly make known their predatory presence.  The stifling 
anxiety and fear quickly return after a momentary relieving "whew, got it."  At 
my University there are those ever-present, dour, prodding, chaining, and 
dampening little impish devils dancing around the campus.  They go by such 
names of "SOIs, (Student Opinion of Instruction)," "annual reports," "promotion 
application," "salary recommendations," and "post tenure review."  And, there 
are more.

        I know.  A little dash of the anxious, fearful, and threatening spur 
you on and make you more creative and productive.  The findings by Gilbert and 
others respond with a "hogwash."  But, that's the rest of the story.  For the 
moment, I just want to raise a red flag, a bright red flag.  And, I want to 
raise it high.  We have to be careful, very careful, for, to paraphrase the 
Talmud, if we believe tenure can do everything, we just might be willing to do 
anything to get it.  And, far, far too many of us are far, far too careless.


Make it a good day

-Louis-


Louis Schmier                                   
http://www.therandomthoughts.edublogs.org       
Department of History                        http://www.therandomthoughts.com
Valdosta State University 
Valdosta, Georgia 31698                     /\   /\  /\                 /\     
/\
(O)  229-333-5947                            /^\\/  \/   \   /\/\__   /   \  /  
 \
(C)  229-630-0821                           /     \/   \_ \/ /   \/ /\/  /  \   
 /\  \
                                                    //\/\/ /\    \__/__/_/\_\/  
  \_/__\  \
                                              /\"If you want to climb 
mountains,\ /\
                                          _ /  \    don't practice on mole 
hills" - /   \_


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=21918
or send a blank email to 
leave-21918-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to