Yes, you are right Mike; thanks for add the complete reference. And thank
you for your input that I also share.
This is a wonderful passage and very important even in political and
historical perspectives;

Thanks
My best, Jose


_____________________________
Jose Ferreira-Alves
School of Psychology
Human cognition Lab
University of Minho
Campus de Gualtar
4710-057 Braga
Portugal
www.psi.uminho.pt
Tel. Office: 351 253604233
Tel. Cel. 351 919378514
Email: [email protected]

-----Mensagem original-----
De: Mike Palij [mailto:[email protected]] 
Enviada: quarta-feira, 12 de Dezembro de 2012 22:08
Para: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Cc: Michael Palij
Assunto: RE: [tips] Question re: Maslow

In the text that Jose quotes below, he does not provide a reference.
I assume that he is quoting one of the following:

(1)  Frick, W. B. (1971). Humanistic psychology: Interviews with Maslow,
Murphy, and Rogers. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
or
(2)  Frick, W. B. (2000). Remembering Maslow: Reflections on a 1968
interview.
Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 40(2), 128-147.
NOTE: this is part of the Sage journal collection.

For those with an interest in Maslow, I think that one should probably read
the 1971 book (it was part of Frick's dissertation) but most should take a
look at the 2000 article because it contains the text below and several
other parts from the book.  It is interesting to see how Maslow deals with
the "failures" of his theory (e.g., why don't people who have their need
taken care of don't automatically continue on to self-actualization, why
some people he considered "self-actualized" did not have peak experiences,
such as Eleanor Roosevelt, and are "merely healthy").

But what is interesting is Frick's closing words on the end of the Cold War
between the West and the USSR and parallel "Cold War" between behaviorism
and psychoanalysis with humanistic psychology as the "Third Force".  His
ideas seem quaint given what was about to happen in 2001 and how the "new
normal" would change everything.

-Mike Palij
New York University
[email protected]


----- Original Message -----
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:16:53 -0800, José Ferreira-Alves wrote:

I found a deep interesting passage about this issue by the words of Maslow
himself; I just take a small portion but the entire interview is compulsory
to those to want to answer the question Annete raised. Apologize for the
extension but it is a really interesting passage for me.

"Frick: Dr. Maslow, with your concern for developing the human potential you
would say, then, that a very narrow person, focusing on model train
building, for example, let’s say this is his real “thing.” This is how he
expresses and finds himself. If he were that narrow, that is, if this was
his consuming interest, could this person be self-actualizing?

Maslow: Well, let’s take a better example, because probably that would be
neurotic, that is, if you poked into such a person you’d find that this was
a flight from or a defense against something. That’s just sort of my
expectation—it might be wrong—this might be full self-actualizing for, let’s
say, an unintelligent person. That might be the best he can do.

Frick: It would be consistent with his other potentials, then?

Maslow: Well, I think we get . . . for instance, I find myself getting
narrow, oh, more and more narrow with my age and becoming so absorbed in my
work that I’ve given up plays, and poetry and making new friends, which I
just don’t do anymore.

Frick: . . . you say you have given all of these things up?
Maslow: Yes. I love my work so much, and am so absorbed with it, that
everything else starts getting to look smaller and smaller.

Frick: Is this good? Is this self-actualizing?

Maslow: Well, whatever it is, I’m doing it. I don’t know. We just don’t
know. . . . I ran across this statement in Darwin. Darwin, saying something
of the sort, said he finally turned into what he thought was a dry, narrow
man, just absorbed with his work, and with nothing else in the whole world.
If I compared this with the reading of novels, and going on trips, and going
to parties, and doing a thousand things, all of which I enjoy doing—I hardly
listen to my records anymore, except for background things. I am so much
more narrowed down to my work which I think is more and more me and more and
more what’s important.

Frick: All right, you’re making choices, aren’t you? This is selfactualizing
for you, perhaps, although you are making certain sacrifices as well.

Maslow: Yes. Whether that’s a good thing or a bad thing, I don’t know. For
society I suspect it’s a good thing.

Frick: For you as a person it may be limiting.

Maslow: Yes. I feel sad over. . . .

Frick: . . . what you’re missing in other ways?

Maslow: Yes, I . . . all the pleasures that I. . . . This semester, for
instance, I gave up the Audubon walks in the woods, and the bird walks,
which I love. Well, it just took too much time.
Well, what did it take time from? I loved it, and yet sacrificed it,
renounced it, gave it up for the sake of my mission, or vocation, or
calling, or something" p.134-135




-----Mensagem original-----
De: Mike Palij [mailto:[email protected]]
Enviada: quarta-feira, 12 de Dezembro de 2012 18:03
Para: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Cc: Michael Palij
Assunto: re: [tips] Question re: Maslow

On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:24:20 -0800, Annette Taylor wrote:
[snip]
>[A colleague asked Annette:]
>Would you mind posting to the board this question: "Does Maslow believe 
>he was self-actualized? Can you provide a scholarly reference for the 
>answer?"
>---------------------------------------
>Since I also find the question interesting I am more than happy to post 
>for her and to read the answers.

First, I have to admit to not being much of a Maslow fan, though I am loathe
to bad-mouth NYC born psychologists (then again, given the NYC born
psychologists that have gone on to fame, I may have to change my policy
about bad-mouthing them) and only know some basic aspects about Maslow
(actually, I may know more than I care to know, such as his connection to
nude psychotherapy).

Second, a quick Google search has turned up some lecture notes by a
professor at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.  Two key points made in the
notes:

(1) Maslow considered only about 2% of the general population to be
"self-actualized".

(2) The Personal Orientation Inventory (POI), which apparently was developed
by Everitt Shostrom, has been used to measure the degree to which a person
is "self-actualized".  Quoting from the notes:

|Ironically, when Maslow completed the POI, it showed that he had only a 
|slight self-actualizing tendency. He scored much lower than individuals 
|who were identified as self-actualizers.
http://homepages.rpi.edu/~verwyc/MASLOWOH.htm
NOTE:  there is no citation for the quote above.

Now, did Maslow believe that he was self-actualized while he was alive?
Perhaps there is some specific source where he argues for or against the
position but that will take someone who is a Maslow scholar/groupie/whatever
to produce/find.

I think a better question is "Can self-actualization be reliably and validly
measured and how did Maslow score?"  If he never was tested, well, what
difference does it make what Maslow thought? A lot of people think that they
are smart while being as dumb as a bag of hammers.

If self-actualization can't be reliably and validly measured, well, Maslow
could have thought that he was self-actualized but how would you "prove" or
provide evidence for it?  Given that Maslow seemed to think that only 2% of
the population was self-actualized, just betting on the baserate, I'd bet
that Maslow was not self-actualized.

I'm interested in seeing what more knowledgeable people have to say. 


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here:
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13079.37464550bba7c9b4601a21fd9decb43c&n=T
&l=tips&o=22344
or send a blank email to
leave-22344-13079.37464550bba7c9b4601a21fd9decb...@fsulist.frostburg.edu


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=22345
or send a blank email to 
leave-22345-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to