Jim, I think you raise an extremely important question. Perhaps one reason why 
some fail to appreciate the paradox is because of a deeply ingrained , strong 
belief in mind-body duality that overrides a strict materialist view of 
existence. Whether that duality, which Paul Bloom believes we are born with, is 
maintained by one’s religion or some other means, the hope always is that those 
experiences, or perhaps key aspects of them, have some basis in external 
‘reality’ (however ‘reality’ might be defined). 



Miguel, who never smoked a joint, let alone take hallucinogens, but who inhaled 
lots of incense in his teens. 
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Clark" <[email protected]> 
To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" 
<[email protected]> 
Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2013 12:14:36 AM 
Subject: Re: [tips] What "Famous" Experiment Was Conducted on "Good Friday"? 

Hi 

The impact of drugs on mystical experiences would appear to be congenial with a 
naturalistic explanation for such experiences. But how would people who believe 
such experiences occur naturally due to supernatural events explain them? 
Indeed, isn't it somewhat paradoxical for people (the subjects) to believe that 
they have had some spiritual insight artificially induced by a chemical? Or is 
it just the "experience" that matters, not some rational interpretation, 
religious or otherwise? 

Take care 
Jim 




James M. Clark 
Professor & Chair of Psychology 
[email protected] 
Room 4L41A 
204-786-9757 
204-774-4134 Fax 
Dept of Psychology, U of Winnipeg 
515 Portage Ave, Winnipeg, MB 
R3B 0R4 CANADA 


>>> "Mike Palij" <[email protected]> 29-Mar-13 6:03 PM >>> 
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 11:56:21 -0700, Jim Clark wrote: 
>Hi 
>Leary was the advisor of Pahnke. The participants were identified 
>as divinity students. 
> http://www.erowid.org/plants/mushrooms/mushrooms_journal2.pdf 

For completeness sake, the reference for the article that Jim links 
to above is: 

Doblin, R. (1991). Pahnke's Good Friday experiment: a long-term 
follow-up and methodological critique. Journal of Transpersonal 
Psychology, 23(1), 1-28. 

NOTE: Doblin's article is a review of Pahnke's dissertation research 
and he identifies a couple of problems that apparently were glossed 
over in the dissertation and in subsequent publications. 

The "Good Friday Experiment" is also known as the "Marsh Chapel 
Experiment" and there is a Wikipedia entry with that name; see: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_Chapel_Experiment 
NOTE: There is info on a 2006 replication of Pahnke's research 
and that research is can be read here: 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050654/ 

The reference for Pahnke's dissertation (it's in Dissertation Abstracts 
aka Proquest Dissertations & Theses) is the following: 

PAHNKE, WALTER NORMAN. "Drugs and Mysticism: 
An Analysis of the Relationship between Psychedelic Drugs 
and the Mystical Consciousness." Harvard University, 1964. 

There is the odd note attached to the entry for Pahnke saying 
the following: 
|Full text views are currently unavailable due to copyright restrictions 

What this means is not exactly clear since the copyright for all 
dissertations are held by their authors though DA/PDT makes some 
dissertations available for immediate download.(e.g., my dissertation 
can be downloaded from DA/PDT; the dissertation for the OTHER 
Michael Palij in Kansas is not available for download). I suppose 
that Pahnke could have told DA/PDT *not* to make it available 
though that defeats the purpose of making the research available to 
others (I never published the work reported in my dissertation and 
have no problem in others having easy access to it). I suppose that 
one could get Pahnke's dissertation from Harvard (see: 
http://hollis.harvard.edu/?itemid=|library/m/aleph|001459501 ) 
but the question remains why Pahnke would restrict access to his 
dissertation while reporting parts of it in places like this: 
http://www.erowid.org/entheogens/journals/entheogens_journal3.shtml 

Well, Good Friday to everyone, Christian or not. 

-Mike Palij 
New York University 
[email protected] 






--- 
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected]. 
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13251.645f86b5cec4da0a56ffea7a891720c9&n=T&l=tips&o=24621
 
or send a blank email to 
leave-24621-13251.645f86b5cec4da0a56ffea7a89172...@fsulist.frostburg.edu 


--- 
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected]. 
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=466839.0421d1005414eed82340aa280e7ce629&n=T&l=tips&o=24629
 
or send a blank email to 
leave-24629-466839.0421d1005414eed82340aa280e7ce...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=24637
or send a blank email to 
leave-24637-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to