Hi Mike et al....don't have much time today (two graduate student defenses, 
plus meetings....), but see the following reference for a brief history of the 
(evidence-based practice) EBP concept as applied to clinical psychology and 
allied fields:

Spring, B. (2007). Evidence-based practice in clinical psychology: What it is; 
why it matters; what you need to know. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63, 
611-631.

Not sure who coined the term "evidence-based," but the concept gained traction 
in medicine with the writings of David Sackett and others in the 1990s:

Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., & Haynes, R. B., & 
Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it 
isn't. British Medical Journal, 312, 71-72.

There's no single authority for determining which treatments are or are not 
"evidence-based."   Different groups within different fields (e.g., clinical 
psychology, medicine, social work) have developed their own criteria.  Within 
psychology, the best known criteria and list of treatments are those developed 
by Division 12 (Society of Clinical Psychology) for empirically supported 
(initially called empirically validated) treatments in the 1990s.  These 
criteria and the list continued to be updated periodically, and other groups 
(such as APA Division 53, Child and Adolescent Psychology) have their own 
criteria as well.  Moreover, empirically supported treatments are only one 
operationalization among many of the research prong of EBP within 
psychotherapy; the American Psychiatric Association has developed its own (much 
decried) practice guidelines, and our own APA is now working (belatedly) on 
doing the same.

Hope some of this helps; back in touch this weekend if more info. if needed.  
...Scott


Scott O. Lilienfeld, Ph.D.
Professor
Department of Psychology, Room 473
Emory University
36 Eagle Row
Atlanta, Georgia 30322
[email protected]; 404-727-1125

The Master in the Art of Living makes little distinction between his work and 
his play, his labor and his leisure, his mind and his body, his education and 
his recreation, his love and his intellectual passions.  He hardly knows which 
is which.  He simply pursues his vision of excellence in whatever he does, 
leaving others to decide whether he is working or playing.  To him - he is 
always doing both.

- Zen Buddhist text
  (slightly modified)


>
> -------    Original Message   --------
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 06:37:38 -0700, Michael Britt wrote:
> Not long ago I interviewed a psychoanalyst/author about the concepts
> of transference, countertransference and dream interpretation and one
> blog commenter almost right away insisted that psychoanalysis was not
> "evidence based". What struck me about the comment (and which I'm
> thinking of focusing on in an upcoming episode), is the knee-jerk
> reaction of "Well, it has to be evidence-based!"  It's almost become a mantra.
>
> Recently we've all become even more focused of the need to strengthen
> our research techniques, but we all know that all our approaches have their
> strengths and weaknesses.   We know that evidence "points toward a conclusion"
> and the more evidence that so the better.  So I'm wondering: when does
> any technique get the "evidence-based" stamp of approval?  Certainly,
> some of our techniques have a strong base of evidence in support of
> their effectiveness (say, systematic desensitization for example) but
> what does it take to get the evidence-based "badge"? For that matter, where 
> did the term come from?
>
> Also, I'm wondering if there aren't politics involved here.  It would
> be interesting if so-called "evidence-based" techniques also happen to
> be the short-term, less expensive ones that also happen to be covered by 
> insurance....
>
> Feedback welcome.
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
> To unsubscribe click here:
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13405.0125141592fa9ededc665c55d9958f
> 69&n=T&l=tips&o=24970 or send a blank email to
> leave-24970-13405.0125141592fa9ededc665c55d9958f69@fsulist.frostburg.e
> du


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13509.d0999cebc8f4ed4eb54d5317367e9b2f&n=T&l=tips&o=24972
or send a blank email to 
leave-24972-13509.d0999cebc8f4ed4eb54d5317367e9...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

________________________________

This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
prohibited.

If you have received this message in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
original message (including attachments).

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=24973
or send a blank email to 
leave-24973-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to