I interrupt my "one thing for students to learn" series with a response 
to a message I had received shortly after I had sent out my last fourth "one 
thing."  Well, it's not really an interruption so much as a pertinent sidebar.
        Almost immediately after I put up my last Random Thought, I received a 
short one line response:  "I still don't understand why aren't all your 'one 
thing for students to learn' not focusing on learning content and developing 
critical thinking skills?" 
        Once again, I briefly answered, "They are."  This time I referred this 
western professor to two short pieces in recent issues of the HBR I had just 
finished reading that coincidently had insights into a more complete answer.  
One was  titled:  "If You’re Not Helping People Develop, You’re Not Management 
Material."  In my extrapolation for our campuses, I would suggest we replace 
"management material" with "teaching material."  The second is titled, "Does 
Your Company Make You A Better Person?"  Likewise, I would suggest in this one 
we replace "company" with "your campus."  Following the line in both articles, 
I would suggest that regardless of what anyone expects from professors in and 
out of the classroom being an unconditional catalyst of student personal 
transformation should be a non-negotiable required competency.  Professors 
should care unconditionally--unconditionally--about each student as a person, 
caringly offer opportunities for personal growth and transformation, faithfully 
help each student break negative habits that are controlling and limiting and 
deafening and blinding her and him to their own abilities and potentials.  
After all, although the connections are not always obvious, the research 
findings tell us that personal change in belief, feeling and attitude are 
inseparable from achievement.  I always tell students, "If you think you can't 
do something, you're right.  If you think you can do something, you're right.  
Now, which 'right' do you want to be?  Let me help you to figure out ways to 
help you answer that question and to help you find your own right path to 
follow."
        Yet, after reading some stuff on my university website, I've been 
wondering if so many of us have reduced higher education to two words:  job and 
tenure?  Have we academics focused too much on our own job security by giving 
our higher priorities to and putting most of our energies into running in the 
"publish-or-perish" rat race in order to get what a departmental colleague once 
called "a guaranteed job for life" at the expense of classroom teaching matters 
and serving others?  Has "higher" too often come to mean "better paying?" Has 
"education" too often come to mean only white collar "vocational training" and 
professional "credentialing?"    
        What has happened to real personal transformation, to molding hearts as 
well as minds, to preparing students for living the good life, not just for 
getting that good job or getting that job for life?  I mean, if we don't help 
someone learn how to be a respectable and responsible human being rather rather 
than just being responsible for getting a respectable grade to get a 
respectable job, what's it all for?  I submit that the purpose of learning is 
growth, development, transformation of our hearts and spirits as well as of our 
resumes and wallets.  
        I would suggest, as the authors of these short articles suggest, that 
to achieve both goals professors first should expand their purpose from “How 
can I get each student to achieve?” to “How can I help each student to achieve 
while helping her or him transform?”  In the spirit of Abraham Maslow, savvy 
teachers know that doing well on the second part of the last question helps to 
answer the first question.  In the spirt of Carol Dweck, professors should 
assume the responsibility of helping students--and themselves--change negative 
or static mind sets to positive, growth, and dynamic ones.  In the spirit of Ed 
Deci, the professors should ask themselves: “How can I harness students' 
strengths and interests and passions;" "how can I give them autonomy to use 
those strengths and interests and passions as a way to see what they can do and 
be;" "how can I give students ownership of what they do rather than slavishly 
follow "what do you want;" "how can I help them see the purpose of what they 
do" so they can answer their own question of "why do I have to take....;" "how 
can I help them see the meaning in what they do that's beyond the content in 
order to allow them to better learn both about the content, about themselves, 
and those around them."  We should be striving to graduate not just honor 
students, but honor persons as well.  

Make it a good day

-Louis-


Louis Schmier                                   
http://www.therandomthoughts.edublogs.org       
203 E. Brookwood Pl                         http://www.therandomthoughts.com
Valdosta, Ga 31602 
(C)  229-630-0821                             /\   /\  /\                 /\    
 /\
                                                      /^\\/  \/   \   /\/\__   
/   \  /   \
                                                     /     \/   \_ \/ /   \/ 
/\/  /  \    /\  \
                                                   //\/\/ /\    \__/__/_/\_\/   
 \_/__\  \
                                             /\"If you want to climb 
mountains,\ /\
                                         _ /  \    don't practice on mole 
hills" - /   \_


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=33808
or send a blank email to 
leave-33808-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to