All
I posted this on my psych department’s student information page today with a 
reminder to the students that eminence (or indirect assessments of it including 
influence, for example) are appeals to authority and specifically not 
necessarily good indicators of the scientific importance or meaningfulness of 
someone’s research or position. Quacks cite quackery, if I may be so bold. I 
urged them to look at the connection to other scientific data and research 
practices and to rely on the primary literature and their examinations of the 
theoretical and research designs.  Are they good questions/hypotheses and are 
they well tested and supported? Are they replicated? Are the results respected 
by those outside the group publishing the data or is it a “scientific faction” 
which often happens with fads and research that is less commendable? (We are 
all familiar with those still practicing and publishing results of hypnotism, 
etc.)
Tim
_______________________________
Timothy O. Shearon, PhD
Professor and Chairperson, Department of Psychology
The College of Idaho
Caldwell, ID 83605
email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

teaching: intro to neuropsychology; psychopharmacology; general; vision



From: Claudia Stanny [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2014 8:47 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] Psych science.?







Thanks for this.

Claudia

_____________________________________________

Claudia J. Stanny, Ph.D.
Director
Center for University Teaching, Learning, and Assessment
University of West Florida
Pensacola, FL  32514

Phone:   (850) 857-6355 (direct) or  473-7435 (CUTLA)

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

CUTLA Web Site: http://uwf.edu/offices/cutla/<http://uwf.edu/cutla/>
Personal Web Pages: http://uwf.edu/cstanny/website/index.htm

On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Gerald Peterson 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Perhaps, another Psychologist I must use to illustrate the violation of 
scientific and ethical principles?

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/eminent-harvard-psychologist-mother-of-positive-psychology-new-age-quack/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=eminent-harvard-psychologist-mother-of-positive-psychology-new-age-quack



G.L. (Gary) Peterson,Ph.D
Psychology@SVSU



---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13144.1572ed60024e708cf21c4c6f19e7d550&n=T&l=tips&o=40251
or send a blank email to 
leave-40251-13144.1572ed60024e708cf21c4c6f19e7d...@fsulist.frostburg.edu<mailto:leave-40251-13144.1572ed60024e708cf21c4c6f19e7d...@fsulist.frostburg.edu>


---

You are currently subscribed to tips as: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13545.bae00fb8b4115786ba5dbbb67b9b177a&n=T&l=tips&o=40252

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)

or send a blank email to 
leave-40252-13545.bae00fb8b4115786ba5dbbb67b9b1...@fsulist.frostburg.edu<mailto:leave-40252-13545.bae00fb8b4115786ba5dbbb67b9b1...@fsulist.frostburg.edu>





---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=40255
or send a blank email to 
leave-40255-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to