Also, some of you may be interested to know that the APA has published
online public information brochures on sexual orientation
<http://www.apa.org/topics/lgbt/orientation.aspx> and gender identity
<http://www.apa.org/topics/lgbt/transgender.aspx>.

Cheers,

Arlie

--
Arlie R. Belliveau, MA

History & Theory of Psychology Doctoral Student
York University Department of Psychology
059 Behavioural Science Building
4700 Keele St. Toronto, ON
[email protected]
www.arliebelliveau.com

On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Arlie Belliveau <[email protected]>
wrote:

> We have a Masters student at York working on the psychometrics of
> complicating sex and gender beyond M/F for psychological measures. I'm
> excited to see what they develop.
>
> Correspondence analysis <http://www.datavis.ca/courses/grcat/grc5.html> (for
> categorical data) or multilevel modeling
> <http://www.biostat.jhsph.edu/~fdominic/teaching/bio656/lectures/1.intro.pdf>
> (for mixed designs) would offer viable solutions to include n levels of a
> gender variable. Or, you could run it as a regression, if the researcher
> had reason to consider (and ability to measure) gender identity as a
> continuum or spectrum.
>
> I absolutely would not be interested in interpreting a 5 way (or even 56
> way
> <http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2014/02/13/facebook_custom_gender_options_here_are_all_56_custom_options.html>)
> interaction ;)
>
> Arlie
>
> --
> Arlie R. Belliveau, MA
>
> History & Theory of Psychology Doctoral Student
> York University Department of Psychology
> 059 Behavioural Science Building
> 4700 Keele St. Toronto, ON
> [email protected]
> www.arliebelliveau.com
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Mike Palij <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 12 May 2015 09:48:08 -0700, Christopher Green wrote:
>>
>>> And, since ANOVA is merely a constrained special case of the
>>> General Linear Model, there is not even really a practical limit
>>> on the number of values a continuous "gender" variable might
>>> assume.
>>>
>>
>> Okay, this is getting a little bit silly.  Not the General Linear Model
>> or how many levels ANOVA can handle (Advice: use few independent
>> levels with few levels; you don't know what a headache is until you
>> try to explain a five-way interaction) but the more fundamental issue
>> of "what is the question that one wants to get answer to?" Michael
>> Scoles below clearly points in this direction and Jim Clark adds
>> to it with the concept of asexuality but is one concerned with:
>>
>> (1) Traditional gender role self-identification (i.e., male or female
>> or some mixture of the two).  Note: this is primarily a psychological
>> variable created through a developmental history within certain
>> cultural environments.  That is, a personally defined gender
>> role consistent with one's experience with one's body and
>> with the cultural strictures concerning sex.
>>
>> (2) Genetically based sex differences (XX vs XY vs variations).
>> Do genes have an influence on sexual orientation and behavior?
>> Maybe, maybe not, see:
>> http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/ViewPage.aspx?pageId=66
>>
>> (3) Sexual behavior (Males having Sex with Females or MSF,
>> Males having Sex with Males or MSM, Females having Sex
>> with Females or FSF, Sex with both Same Sex and Opposite
>> Sex, Sorry No Sex -- We're British, etc.).
>> Note:  Sexual behavior does not have to reflect sexual orientation
>> as AIDS/HIV research have shown:  males who define themselves
>> as traditional heterosexuals may engage in sex with other
>> males ["on the down low"] and deny any homosexual interests or
>> attractions
>> Note #2: Given the adaptability of human behavior, including
>> sexual behavior, it should come as no surprise that males and
>> females may define themselves one way ("straight","gay/lesbian",
>> etc.) but still behave in ways that are inconsistent with that
>> definition.  For example, "straight" males and females when put
>> into situations where access to the opposite sex is limited, may
>> engage in homosexual behavior without changing their sexual
>> orientation.  While in prison, some people become "gay for
>> the stay", that is, will engaged in homosexual behavior while in
>> prison but return to heterosexual behavior when released.
>> There is "gay for pay", that is, one engages in same sex acts
>> to earn money but engages in heterosexual personal relationships.
>> See also paragraph #3 in the CRG article I link to above:
>> During one phase of one's life one is one way but during a
>> later phase they're another.
>>
>> So, which is it:
>> (a) Self-definition/cultural definition of sexual role and identity
>> (b) Genetic definition of sexual role and identity
>> (c) Behavioral definition of sexual role and identity
>>
>> Or are all three involved but, as is the human tendency, we tend
>> to oversimplify things just to be able to get through the day because
>> we have too many other things to consider and do as well.
>>
>> By the way, I've taken to saying in my research methods and statistics
>> classes "Let's use 'Sex/Gender' as a grouping variable and, for
>> purposes of simplification, let's just assume there are two levels.
>> We can complicate things after we get through the basics."
>>
>> -Mike Palij
>> New York University
>> [email protected]
>>
>> P.S.  I'll leave the category of "bi-curious" to someone else.
>> I'm tuckered out from thinking so much about sex. ;-)
>>
>>
>>  On May 12, 2015, at 10:11 AM, Jim Clark wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Since ANOVA handles any number of levels of a factor (2, 3, 7, 24? .),
>>> ANOVA
>>> need make no adjustment to accommodate more complex models of human
>>> sexual
>>> orientation. It is the researcher who must decide what is the appropriate
>>> number of levels and expected pattern of results, all of which is happily
>>> handled by ANOVA.
>>>
>>> To further complicate matters, there is a growing literature on
>>> Asexuality
>>> that might be relevant here, depending on how one is defining the
>>> different
>>> levels of the sexual orientation factor. That is, if it is defined by the
>>> targets of people's sexual attraction, then clearly Asexuality needs to
>>> be
>>> accommodated. Here's a link to Tony Bogaert's book:
>>>
>>> http://www.amazon.com/Anthony-F.-Bogaert/e/B007LU54TY
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, May 12, 2015 9:03 AM, Michael Scoles wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Sir or Madam:
>>>
>>> You raise an interesting question, but in order to answer it, more
>>> information is needed.
>>>  (1) What is the dependent variable and what is the reason for
>>> investigating
>>> its association with gender?
>>>  (2) From your description, it appears that there is a second independent
>>> variable, with two levels.  What is this variable and what are the
>>> levels?
>>>  (3) LGBT is an acronym with four letters (some would add Q), but you
>>> only
>>> include 3 levels for gender in your proposed design.  Which group are you
>>> choosing to offend?
>>>
>>> Thank you for any clarification you can provide.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:46 AM, michael sylvester wrote:
>>>
>>> With Bruce Jenner in  mind.ANOVA may have to make some adjustmes to
>>> accommodate
>>> LGBT subjects. Currently the gender variable N2  male/female but with
>>> LGBT
>>> subjects coming into the subject pool we may be lookimg not at a 2x2
>>> design
>>> but a 3x2 design.Of course ANOVA
>>> measures simple,main,and interaction effects.Those analyses would be very
>>> interestingWith LGBT a subset of the gender paradigm,when does the he or
>>> the
>>> she kicks in.
>>> michael
>>> daytona beach.florida
>>> 'going beyond where no tipster has gone before.'
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe click here:
>> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13091.5fbcba6b94d471416a45a34246e4403b&n=T&l=tips&o=44735
>> or send a blank email to
>> leave-44735-13091.5fbcba6b94d471416a45a34246e44...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
>>
>
>

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=45200
or send a blank email to 
leave-45200-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to