Hi

From: Wuensch, Karl Louis [mailto:[email protected]]

          Yes, meta-analysis is called for here, if you can get the data out of 
all those file drawers.


My concern is that even more rigid criteria for publication (larger Ns or 
higher significance levels) will increase the file-drawer problem, exacerbating 
the challenge of accurate meta-analysis. Reducing the threshold for purely 
"empirical" papers or having some way for them to be deposited in some 
repository would facilitate meta-analysis and the identification of "real" 
effects. Of course the research community would have to have some benefit to 
accrue to replication studies; otherwise, people might never undertake them.

There were some other interesting points made in the article.

One was that replication rates were higher in the cognitive than social 
journals. They mentioned the use of within-s designs as one possible 
explanation. Might it also be the case that dependent variables in the 
cognitive area have fewer uncontrolled sources of variability, hence making the 
effects "cleaner" (less noisy?) and easier to replicate? I don't recall whether 
they distinguished between experimental and non-experimental effects, which 
could be another difference between areas.

Another observation was that interaction effects were less likely to replicate 
than main effects. The proper analysis of interactions is challenging and 
something of an issue. Specifically, the default ANOVA approach is optimal only 
for rare cross-over interactions, yet some (e.g., Rosenthal) argue that is the 
proper approach to interactions even when it is not appropriate (according to 
some people) as when no effect is expected in one condition (e.g., control 
group) and only in other conditions. The latter responds better to simple 
effects analysis, which according to the ANOVA purist "confounds" main and 
interaction effects.

Let's hope these kinds of studies lead to thoughtful and constructive changes 
in the discipline and also do not harm the credibility of research in the eyes 
of those who already would like to minimize its impact.

Take care
Jim

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=46485
or send a blank email to 
leave-46485-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to