The results of the "reproducibility project" have been getting a lot of attention this week. However, it makes the same mistake of relying uncritically on the "critical value" dichotomy as do many psychological studies. Re-interpreting the results using a Bayesian approach adds some much-needed nuance to the findings. And here it is:
Christopher Green shared with you: The Bayesian Reproducibility Project alexanderetz.com - The Reproducibility Project was finally published this week in Science, and an outpouring of media articles followed. Headlines included “More Than 50% Psychology Studies Are Questionable: Study”, “Scientists Replicated 100 Psychology Studies, and Fewer Than Half Got the Same Results”, and “More than half of psychology papers are not reproducible”. Chris ....... Christopher D Green Department of Psychology York University Toronto, ON M3J 1P3 43.773759, -79.503722 [email protected] http://www.yorku.ca/christo --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected]. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=46494 or send a blank email to leave-46494-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
