I find this case scary from so many viewpoints but one that struck me was how one could go from being a chair of the department to a non-person so quickly.
I would advise my colleagues to run from RU-N. Ken > On Oct 24, 2015, at 10:11 AM, Mike Palij <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 01:38:16 +0000, Helweg-Larsen, Marie wrote: >> >> http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/25/magazine/the-strange-case-of-anna-stubblefield.html?em_pos=large&emc=edit_ma_20151023&nl=magazine&nlid=30609997 >> Facilitated communication again. > > There are various news sources in the New York-New Jersey area that > have written articles about the trial but the article above appears to be most > comprehensive. For comparison's sake, here's a much shorter article > from the NY Daily News: > http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/ex-rutgers-professor-guilty-sexual-assault-article-1.2387515 > > Although the NY Times article states that she was a tenured professor > at Rutgers University-Newark, the NY Daily News add that she was or > used to be the chairperson of the philosophy dept. But, you have to > give it up to RU-Newark: a search of the school's website turns up > only two hits where her name appears; see: > http://www.newark.rutgers.edu/search/site/Stubblefield > she is not listed on the Philosophy dept's faculty list; see: > http://www.ncas.rutgers.edu/faculty-staff-directory/670 > And though she is still listed as an associate member of the RU > Graduate Faculty in Philosophy (Arts & Sciences) -- see: > http://philosophy.rutgers.edu/for-faculty/244-ethics-and-value-theory-faculty > the link next to her name that goes to a webpage at RU-Newark > no longer works: > http://www.ncas.rutgers.edu/node/692Faculty/Anna.html > RU-N cleaned up real good. > > For the intellectually curious, here's a list of her publications/citations > on Google Scholar: > https://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=%22Anna+Stubblefield%22&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=1%2C33 > But perhaps of most interest is an article she wrote that is referred > to in the NYT article and argues that opposition to FC is comparable > to "hate speech"; see: > http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/1729/1777 > > It's interesting that claims of pseudoscience can be labeled > as "hate speech", it's a useful tactic against such claims. > I wonder what Scott L. thinks? > > -Mike Palij > New York University > [email protected] > > > --- > You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected]. > To unsubscribe click here: > http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13524.94845a3ed9806f1cef14973830dd8c39&n=T&l=tips&o=47121 > or send a blank email to > leave-47121-13524.94845a3ed9806f1cef14973830dd8...@fsulist.frostburg.edu --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected]. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=47127 or send a blank email to leave-47127-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
