Reminds me of this article:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147596701917342

Bertocchi, G., & Spagat, M. (2001). The Politics of Co-optation. Journal of 
Comparative Economics, 29(4), 591-607. 

Abstract

Our model consists of two groups. Group 1 holds political power and Group 2 
threatens this power. Group 1 decreases the probability of its upheaval by 
co-opting some agents from Group 2 into a more benign third group. Improvements 
in the upheaval technology lead to fewer but better co-optation offers. 
Increasing the size and/or the degree of fragmentation of Group 2 has the 
opposite effect. If the co-opted group also threatens Group 1, co-optation 
transfers are reduced. Our model provides a new explanation of why growth is a 
politically stabilizing force. The theory suggests that, in post-Communist 
privatizations, unstable governments will give large benefits to a small number 
of beneficiaries while stable governments will give small benefits to a large 
group.



________________________________________
From: Mike Palij <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 4:13 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Cc: Michael Palij
Subject: [tips] Have Scientists Become Gutless Wonders?

The Chronicle of Higher Education has an interview with the
chemist/water scientist who helped to expose that the water
supply in Flint, Michigan was poisoning its inhabitants with
lead -- perhaps some Tipsters have heard of this?  Anyway,
Marc Edwards talks about the cost of being a scientist and
taking on the "Establishment", meaning local government,
state government, federal government, the scientists who
are associated with these governmental agencies (e.g.,
the environmental protection agencies), academia, the
reward structure of science, and even one's friends when
one attempts to do the "right thing".  The article can be
accessed here:
http://chronicle.com/article/The-Water-Next-Time-Professor/235136

For those curious about his scientific productivity, check
out his publication list on Google Scholar:
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=Je0IEScAAAAJ&hl=en

I think it was Sartre who said that one should avoid places that
would make one do evil -- has a scientific career become one
of those places?

-Mike Palij
New York University
[email protected]




---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13058.902daf6855267276c83a639cbb25165c&n=T&l=tips&o=48047
or send a blank email to 
leave-48047-13058.902daf6855267276c83a639cbb251...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=48053
or send a blank email to 
leave-48053-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to