Must an “effect” always be a causal effect? Is it not also reasonable to speak 
of a statistical effect, so long as we keep the two meanings distinct?

Chris
…..
Christopher D Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
Canada
43.773895°, -79.503670°

[email protected]
http://www.yorku.ca/christo
orcid.org/0000-0002-6027-6709
………………………………...

On Jul 18, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Stuart McKelvie <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Dear Dap and Tipsters,
>  
> Here is my opinion:
>  
> The term “effect” is sometimes used loosely and wrongly when correlational 
> research has been conducted. A better term in this case would be 
> “relationship”.
>  
> It has been argued that longitudinal studies may permit the term “effect” if 
> they are based on sophisticated correlational designs with statistical 
> controls (e.g. path analysis), but this is by no means accepted. In any case, 
> longitudinal designs are not usually of this kind. The major problem is that 
> longitudinal design are usually involve subject variables.
>  
> The gold standard for studies that demonstrate cause and effect is the true 
> experimental design. Of course, if does not guarantee that a causal 
> relationship has been demonstrated, but it is our best bet, in my opinion.
>  
> Sincerely,
>  
> Stuart
>  
>  
> ___________________________________________________________________________
>                                    "Floreat Labore"
>  
>                                <image010.jpg>                       
>             "Recti cultus pectora roborant"
>                                      
> Stuart J. McKelvie, Ph.D.,     Phone: 819 822 9600 x 2402
> Department of Psychology,         Fax: 819 822 9661
> Bishop's University,
> 2600 rue College,
> Sherbrooke,
> Québec J1M 1Z7,
> Canada.
>  
> E-mail: [email protected] (or [email protected])
>  
> Bishop's University Psychology Department Web Page:
> http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy   
>  
>                          Floreat Labore"
>  
>                              <image011.jpg>
>  
> <image012.jpg>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
>  
>  
>  
>  
> From: Dap Louw [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: July-18-17 2:28 PM
> To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
> Subject: [tips] Opinions needed
>  
>  
> 
>  
>  
> Tipsters
>  
> I am well aware that (and often frustrated by) all sorts of buzz words, 
> concepts, theories, etc become the flavour of the month/year in 
> organizations, including universities.  I would therefore appreciate your 
> viewpoint on the following, especially as research methodology is not my 
> field of specialization:
>  
> To what extent can we measure ‘effect’?  In the last 40 years in Psychology 
> I’ve been involved in hundreds of studies on “The effect of ……… (television 
> on …; poverty on ….., etc, etc)”.  BTW, when I used ‘ “the effect of" 
> psychology’ in Google Scholar search I got 2 460 000 results.  However:
>  
> According to the latest recommendations of our University’s Research 
> Committee we cannot measure effect unless you make use of especially the 
> longitudinal design.  Therefore any title such as  “The effect of ……… 
> (television on …; poverty on ….., etc, etc)” is unacceptable and should be 
> replaced by “the perceived effect of …..” or something similar.  Is this a 
> case of methodology or semantics?
>                                                                               
>                                                                               
>                      
> I look forward to hearing from you.  It’s high time to get the TIPS ball 
> rolling again!
>  
> Regards from this side of the ocean.
>  
> Dap
>  
> <image013.jpg>
> Dap Louw
> Extraordinary Professor: Psychology
> Buitengewone Professor: Sielkunde
> Faculty / Fakulteit: The Humanities / Geesteswetenskappe
> PO Box / Posbus 339, Bloemfontein 9300, Republic of South Africa / Republiek 
> van Suid-Afrika
> <image014.jpg>27(0)43 841 1193
> <image015.jpg>27(0)83 391 8331
> <image016.jpg>[email protected]
> <image017.png><image018.png><image019.png>
> <image020.jpg>
> <image021.jpg>
>  
>  
>  
>  
> University of the Free State:
> This message and its contents are subject to a disclaimer.
> Please refer to http://www.ufs.ac.za/disclaimer for full details. 
> 
> Universiteit van die Vrystaat:
> Hierdie boodskap en sy inhoud is aan 'n vrywaringsklousule onderhewig.
> Volledige besonderhede is by http://www.ufs.ac.za/disclaimer vrywaring 
> beskikbaar.
> 
> ---
> 
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
> 
> To unsubscribe click here: 
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13510.2cc18398df2e6692fffc29a610cb72e3&n=T&l=tips&o=51053
> 
> (It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)
> 
> or send a blank email to 
> leave-51053-13510.2cc18398df2e6692fffc29a610cb7...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
> 
> ---
> 
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
> 
> To unsubscribe click here: 
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=430248.781165b5ef80a3cd2b14721caf62bd92&n=T&l=tips&o=51054
> 
> (It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)
> 
> or send a blank email to 
> leave-51054-430248.781165b5ef80a3cd2b14721caf62b...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=51055
or send a blank email to 
leave-51055-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to