Is there redemption for scientists who have had papers retracted due to various forms of scientific misconduct? Should their subsequent research be banned or should they be given the same review (possibly with additional checking of data and images) that other researchers who have not had retractions? An article on The Scientist website review one case and how it was handled. Do you agree? see: http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/50124/title/How-Journals-Treat-Papers-from-Researchers-Who-Committed-Misconduct/&utm_campaign=NEWSLETTER_TS_The-Scientist-Daily_2016&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=55470090&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_SZGo9glbfFU2KNYG2USGNzHI9NZLrkiaxFEUh2JVMBwzeJSOpEJkHDHdWb61jpx--OdozOFIAwMMjRIwHL_qiq-DQZw&_hsmi=55470090
One thing to keep in mind that this case involved basic research with plants and research that directly involves humans (e.g., drug trial, testing of surgical procedures, etc.). Should this make a difference? -Mike Palij New York University m...@nyu.edu --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@mail-archive.com. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=51226 or send a blank email to leave-51226-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
