Some editors apparently don't think so. See: http://retractionwatch.com/2017/08/29/citation-not-enough/#more-51589
A couple of points: (1) Which well-known Tipster is asked about this case? (Hint: It ain't me ;-) (2) Thank the Flying Spaghetti Monster that it doesn't involve an article in psychology but one in the "hard" sciences. ;-) NOTE: Has anyone else developed concerns that Mr T and his posse's promotion of "fake news" is expanding to "fake science" (global warming has already been attacked but I am now referring to ALL science, that is, supporting an anti-science view) and places like Retraction Watch might be used as evidence that science is fake one should rely on "alt.science" instead? It would seem that rationality itself is under attack and critical thinking has either failed or Mr T's fans never learned it (i.e., those that never went to college but doesn't high school provide a basis to critical thinking?). Then again, people in the "Academy" may also be to blame with the promotion of positions like "post-modernism". On another list that I'm on this idea was briefly considered but I would suggest that one look at the following article how it might operate especially in certain religious contexts that claims "special knowledge" about the world. See: http://www.butterfliesandwheels.org/2003/postmodernism-science-and-religious-fundamentalism/ Best wishes and hope for a quick recovery to everyone, Tipsters or not, to people affected by hurricane Harvey. NYC is still getting over the effects of Super Storm Sandy. -Mike Palij New York University m...@nyu.edu --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@mail-archive.com. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=51293 or send a blank email to leave-51293-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
