How to respond to a less than empathetic query from a professor.  I’ve 
been pondering her dismissal questions for quite a while.  Yeaterday, as I 
worked to come out from the fogs of my Thanksgiving tryptophan overdose on my 7 
mile meditative power walk, I started  thinking about Dennis, and came up with 
a rather long answer.  Here is the first part of it:

        “You know most education happens by contagion of either therapeutic or 
toxic emotion.   As Sigal Basade would say, if you want to retain students, 
increase their productivity, and raise the possibility of their success, 
welcome them, embrace them, love them, encourage and support them, each and 
everyone of them.  All life in that classroom, and elsewhere as well, is 
connected however you try to remain disconnected.  To be connected or to be 
disconnected, says Basade, is an emotional decision, not a technological or 
pedagogical or intellectual one.  And, however, you decide to feel and then 
act, as students such as Dennis reveal, your impact, overtly or subtly, 
expands, amplifies, lengthens, widens, deepens.   It cascades over miles, in 
lives, through the years.  It effects the world, it influences the future, in 
ways you don’t know or can’t imagine.  What you can imagine is that 
unconditional empathy and compassion, gentleness and love, kindness and caring, 
faith and hope, the intent to enrich the lives of others with support and 
encouragement, are essential for the nourishment of meaning and purpose in both 
your and students' lives.” 

        “From personal and professional experience, I will tell you this:  
there is a connection between service and joy, between empathy andhope, and 
between compassion and awe.  It is an acknowledgment, as Mother Teresa might 
say, that we belong to each other.  Human beings are influenced and shaped by 
kinship throughout their lives, and the classroom is no exception.  Human 
connection among students and between each student and the professor is the 
best teaching technique.  I have found a fullness in that connection, a call to 
delight in each student, a putting of flesh and bones and names and faces on 
the words ‘faith,’ ‘hope,’ and ‘love,’ and having an ability to be a man of 
innumerable second chances.  And, I have seen over and over and over again that 
its absence creates a cessation of caring, a fragility, a fear, a lethal 
absence of hope, and a cruel alienation.  Disconnection, sometimes called 
‘being objective,’ is a form of spiritual ailment, a tiny spiritedness, a 
judgmentalism.  It’s what Abraham Herschel called an ‘eye disease’ that is a 
basis for an inability to see the full humanity of those fellow human beings we 
call ‘students.’  Now, no one can ‘humanize’ students into what they already 
are; no one can elevate students to the heights they already hold.  No, we 
cannot do anything to any student; we have to do it to ourselves.  Too many of 
us have to ask ourselves why do we presume there’s a distance between us and 
the students; why do we so often so readily hold tightly to impersonal and 
cardboard stereotypes, generalities, and labels; what is it that is blocking us 
so often from seeing the full humanity of each student.”   

        “I remember that in graduate school we graduates would grumble about 
how the professors treated us as ‘lower than whale shit.’  So, why do so many 
of us now turn around and treat so many students that way?   My refusal to do 
unto students what was done unto me  gives me the tools to release emotions.  
It arms me with the ability to feel.  I allows me to be able to understand why, 
as Ed Deci would say, we do what we do—or don’t do.  It’s a constant exercise 
in increasing empathy and compassion.   It’s the way to becoming wiser, 
humbler, kinder, and more ‘awe-full.’  It slows; it provokes; it enriches; it 
uncovers and reveals hidden stories; it honors; it enlivens; it opens the eyes 
and heart; it recasts the personal we call ‘student,’ and even ourselves; and, 
it emboldens to break through what I call the ‘devalue line’ and to connect.”  

        “To do that, we have to focus more on establishing human connection 
than on changing methods, techniques, or technology.  We can’t practice an 
elitism that culls out the ‘don’t belongs.'  We can’t just focus on and blame 
the students.  We can’t place conditions on our caring.  You know sometimes, 
more often than I would like, think that academia is museum in which we 
professors practice an obscurantism with resumes, assessments, peripheral 
matters of pedagogy, assessment, getting promotion and tenure almost at any 
cost.  We ultimately have to shake out our pedagogical cobwebs.  We have to get 
expand our knowledge base beyond our discipline, to learn from the scientific 
literature on learning and apply its results.  And, we have to assume 
responsibility and change ourselves.  We have to see that that ‘eye disease,’ 
which demeans both student and professor with fear and disdain, is rooted in a 
deeper ‘heart disease’ of a disconnection resting on on the exercise of power 
and authority.  We have to see that our conditional ‘I care, if…’ is thin and 
imitation caring, a cheap caring that carries no weight.  We have to see and 
believe, and help each student to see and believe, that  there is so much more 
in both ourselves and each of them.  We have to see that the cure for that ‘eye 
disease’ and ‘heart disease’ is community that meshes that professorial power 
and authority with an unconditional faith, hope, and love.  When we apply that 
curative, I assure you, it will transform our vision from seeing an ‘awful’ 
student or class into an ‘awe-full’ one.” 

        “Now, it is not easy to change.  God, don’t I know that!  To transform 
ourselves, we have to explore our uncomfortable histories and habit.  We have 
to admit that they exist; we have to deal with what is it that wants to keep us 
safe and comfortable by avoiding the risks of adventuring into the unknown.  
And, how well I know that kind of self-exploration can be painful and 
terrifying.  But, we must have it if we are to teach with integrity and 
wholeness.  We have to confront anything within us that is holding us back.  If 
we don’t work on our stuff, our stuff will continue to work on us.  It will 
continue to whisper in our ears; it will work on us however good our intentions 
may be; it will show up at every nook and cranny in our lives, and that 
controlling stuff will remain to us the ultimate truth voiced in “It’s not me,” 
“I’m not comfortable doing that.” “I can’t.” and “I don’t have tenure.”
        
        “Now, this is not highfalutin or wishy-washy or fluff.  Let me go back 
to the research findings of Sigal Barsade and her 2016 article written with 
Olivia O’Neill in the Harvard Business Review titled ‘Manage Your Emotional 
Culture.’   That article led me to an earlier article in the HBR, ‘Employees 
Who Feel Love Perform Better,’ and then to still another that appeared in  the 
Administrative Science Quarterly, ‘What Does Love Have to Do With It?’  While 
they are writing about how emotions play in the workplace, their observations 
cut across all professions, and certainly are applicable to the classroom.  Two 
sentences in the first article caught my eye.  The first was at the beginning 
of the article:  'Most companies pay little attention to how employees are—or 
should be—feeling. They don’t realize how central emotions are to building the 
right culture.”' Replace ‘companies’ with 'professors.'  The other sentence was 
towards the end:   ‘Most leaders focus on how employees think and behave—but 
feelings matter just as much.’  Replace ‘employee’ with ‘students ‘and 
‘leaders' with “professors.” 

        “Between these two sentences, they argue, that what they call 
‘cognitive culture’—thinking and behaving —is only part of the story.  The 
often ignored ‘emotional culture’—feeling expressed silently in unspoken facial 
expressions, body language, and vocal tones—is the crucial rest of the story.  
And, when you gloss over ‘emotional culture,' you’re ignoring what makes people 
tick.  That is, emotions determine how people perform tasks, how engaged they 
are, how imaginative and creative they are, how happy or sad they are, how 
fearless or fearful they are, how resilient or brittle they are, and how 
positive or negative they are.   They ask what if students came to class 
knowing you were really looking forward to seeing each of them and what if they 
came to class looking forward to seeing you.  They say that love was one of the 
strongest drivers of satisfaction and commitment and engagement.  What they 
call connecting ‘companionate love’—caring about and for one another, having a 
compassion for one another, having a tenderness towards one another, being kind 
to each other—generated better moods, better performance, more satisfaction, 
greater achievement.   Love’s opposite, as well as faith’s and hope’s, is 
disconnecting, objectifying indifference.  That indifference is a toxic 
attitude; it is a corrosive that makes it harder for anyone to perform.”  

        “For me, then, the findings of such researchers as Barsade and O’Neille 
communal ’awe-full,’ then, warms the icy chill of ‘awful.’  With ‘awe-full' 
comes broad smiles rather than sneers and frowns, wide eyes instead of drooping 
eye lids, keen ears rather than deafness, an open and warm heart instead of a 
closed and cold one, welcoming handshakes instead of fists, embracing arms 
instead of folded ones, boundless energy instead of  lethargy, and, above all, 
a meaningful purpose.  Never old.  Never stale.  Never routine.  Never casual.  
Never easy.  ‘Awe-full’ is that ‘radical amazement’ of Abraham Herschel.  He 
said, to paraphrase him, our goal should be to get up each morning and go 
through the day seeing the world in a way where everything and everyone is 
incredible.  Yeah, that pretty well sums up ‘awe-full.’” 

Make it a good day

-Louis-


Louis Schmier                                   
http://www.therandomthoughts.edublogs.org       
203 E. Brookwood Pl                         
Valdosta, Ga 31602 
(C)  229-630-0821                          /\   /\  /\                 /\     /\
                                                      /^\\/  \/   \   /\/\__   
/   \  /   \
                                                     /     \/   \_ \/ /   \/ 
/\/  /  \    /\  \
                                                   //\/\/ /\    \__/__/_/\_\/   
 _/__\  \
                                             /\"If you want to climb 
mountains,\ /\
                                         _ /  \    don't practice on mole 
hills" - /   \_


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@mail-archive.com.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=51767
or send a blank email to 
leave-51767-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to