On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Cameron Laird <came...@phaseit.net> wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:52:56PM +0200, Geoff Bache wrote: > . > . > . >> root.after_idle(foo) >> >> and >> >> root.after(0, foo) >> >> ? >> >> (I've noticed that if I call after_idle and re-add it at the end of my >> callbacks then any calls to "after" have no effect, and that I can >> work around this by doing after(0, ...) instead, but wondered if there >> were any drawbacks to doing this.) > . > . > . > Does <URL: http://wiki.tcl.tk/9926 > help? >
Hi Cameron, Thanks for the tip, hadn't occurred to me to look for Tcl/Tk documentation. It didn't really answer the question though and I must admit I don't speak Tcl so didn't really follow the example (which looked to me like it nested a call to "after" inside a call to "after_idle", why would you want to do that?) Regards, Geoff _______________________________________________ Tkinter-discuss mailing list Tkinter-discuss@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tkinter-discuss
