On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 05:03:50PM +0100, Michael Lange wrote: > > Personally I hardly ever use map(), so I never noticed that. In fact this > change is actually documented, see > https://docs.python.org/3.0/whatsnew/3.0.html#views-and-iterators-instead-of-lists > : > > "map() and filter() return iterators. If you really need a list, a quick > fix is e.g. list(map(...)), but a better fix is often to use a list > comprehension (especially when the original code uses lambda), or > rewriting the code so it doesn’t need a list at all. Particularly tricky > is map() invoked for the side effects of the function; the correct > transformation is to use a regular for loop " > > Not sure what's the use of these map objects, in Python3 now you can call > the map object's __next__() method to iterate. > But for your purpose certainly the for loop is the way to go. > > Best regards > > Michael
Thanks, that clears it up. Somehow I had missed this. Reinis _______________________________________________ Tkinter-discuss mailing list Tkinter-discuss@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tkinter-discuss
