Unfortunately I am not an expert, so my feed back is extremely limited, however I can see value in what you are doing. I have been designing a simple PCB designer to drive my CNC machine. It is Python 3 and uses the tkinter library. I am making good progress but find the syntax for the GUI elements somewhat "taxing" as it makes the setting up the components feel like a dog's dinner. Different, but related functions, don't feel logical. Given the amount required for even a simple GUI any rationalisation of the syntax that helps understand their interdependence would be good. I hope I have understood your intentions. Cheers, RobW
On 27 October 2017 8:24:41 pm AEDT, adil gourinda <rikudou__sen...@outlook.com> wrote: >Hy >I am asking your opinion about the last diagram, I want to solve the >pathname problem with it. >________________________________ >From: Tkinter-discuss ><tkinter-discuss-bounces+rikudou__sennin=live....@python.org> on behalf >of Michael Lange <klappn...@web.de> >Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 10:27:19 AM >To: tkinter-discuss@python.org >Subject: Re: [Tkinter-discuss] tcl/tk's syntax to python's syntax > >Hi, > >On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 21:11:48 +0000 >adil gourinda <rikudou__sen...@live.com> wrote: > >> With the aim to make translation of tcl/tk's syntax to python's >syntax >> more easy I made this flowchart and I ask you to check it. >> >> Thanks for your help😊 > >I think the translation of the Tk pathName is problematic. One thing >that >might come closer could be > > ".parentWidget.childWidget" -> "Instance" > ".parentWidget" -> "parentWidget" > >But strictly speaking I think this is not correct either. If the Tk >root >window is the parent, parentWidget is only "." . If a Frame ".f" is the >parent, parent widget *is* ".f" in Tk,and a Button widget "b" that is a >child of ".f" in Tk *is* ".f.b". Of course considering this the chart >might look a bit pointless, like > > "parentWidget" -> "parentWidget" > >Actually the widgets' names (as "b" and "f" in the above example) go to >the widget's "name" option in Python, which is hardly ever used though >(in Tkinter we usually let Python assign the widget names automatically >which leads to something that looks like ".1234567890.1234567891" >instead >of ".f.b"). > >I hope this makes some sense, and maybe one of the Tk experts here can >provide a better explanation. > >Best regards > >Michael > > >.-.. .. ...- . .-.. --- -. --. .- -. -.. .--. .-. --- ... .--. . >.-. > >It [being a Vulcan] means to adopt a philosophy, a way of life which is >logical and beneficial. We cannot disregard that philosophy merely for >personal gain, no matter how important that gain might be. > -- Spock, "Journey to Babel", stardate 3842.4 >_______________________________________________ >Tkinter-discuss mailing list >Tkinter-discuss@python.org >https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tkinter-discuss
_______________________________________________ Tkinter-discuss mailing list Tkinter-discuss@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tkinter-discuss
