Hi Thomas, On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 08:12:42PM +0100, Thomas Beierlein wrote: > Am Tue, 6 Jan 2015 19:56:44 +0100 > schrieb Ervin Hegedüs <airw...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > Wrt to the wiki I had done some experiments with the github one some > > > time ago and I only remember that I was not very impressed. But I > > > can not remember any more why exactly. Easiest way would be to make > > > a own test repo on github and experiment with the wiki for that > > > repo. > > > > > > We can link to that wiki anytime later from the static pages (and > > > even switching to a different one should be easy). > > > > Why does it need any non-static page for a wiki? We're using some > > Mediawiki at our company, that's also contains static pages - which > > formatted by a simple markup language. It's more, than enough... > > > ... > > Sorry if I choose the wrong words. I do mean 'static page' in another > context. These are pages which can only be modified by someone having > access to the github repo - that is different than a normal wiki where > every user (maybe after registration) can add content.
ah, yes, thanks - that's clear now. But I think the (new) situation above is also could be enough for us - I don't see the real different between "having access to the github repo" vs "after registration". Okay, for github, there some git knowledge required... But any other reason? Thanks, 73, Ervin HA2OS -- I � UTF-8 _______________________________________________ Tlf-devel mailing list Tlf-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tlf-devel
