I'm not opposed to using a new content type in this way, if folks feel that this makes things better.
Cheers, Andrei -----Original Message----- From: Martin Thomson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 9:13 AM To: Andrei Popov <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [TLS] Review of PR #209 On 3 August 2015 at 17:21, Andrei Popov <[email protected]> wrote: >> use CertificateRequest within the handshake, and the new content type >> outside of it > > Would the client then also use this new content type for Certificate and > CertificateVerify messages (when these are sent after the handshake is > complete)? Yeah, I think that's best. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
