Note: RFC 4642 does not seem to have been a work product of the TLS WG, so you probably want to raise this in UTA.
-Ekr On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Salz, Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > > Maybe a new RFC obsoleting RFC 4642 (which could at the same time > > become a standard instead of a proposed standard)? > > Is there any reason why NNTP cannot just use the UTA specifications? > (It's been awhile since I "dabbled" in NNTP :) > > /r$ > > > -- > Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies > IM: [email protected] Twitter: RichSalz > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
