I would say that 32-bits would be optimal, since that is the typical word-size 
of processors that need alignment. 2-bytes isn’t much better than 5-bytes in 
this regard.
--
-Todd Short
// [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
// "One if by land, two if by sea, three if by the Internet."

On Nov 17, 2015, at 3:45 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

On Tue 2015-11-17 12:09:30 -0500, Eric Rescorla wrote:
The concern here is backward compatibility with inspection middleboxes which
expect the length field to be in a particular place. We agreed in Seattle to
wait for early deployment experience before modifying the header to move
the length.

In particular, if we're going to make a change to the TLS record header,
the change would be to remove the version and the type entirely, leaving
only two octets of length on each record.  Is a two-octet offset going
to be problematic?

        --dkg

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to