> it seems blindingly obvious to me that we want it
Few things, particularly in the security arena, are blindingly obvious. If it
actually provides no true protection, then it's just as bad as the security
theater in US airports.
> If we can avoid adding them in TLS
We're not adding anything as SNI is already in plaintext. (Precision counts:).
And we have already added numerous important privacy protections to TLS 1.3.
/r$
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
