On 23 February 2016 at 10:43, Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> wrote: > But leave it as a relative time, contrasting the absolute expiration time of > the server configuration -- why not go for full-out parallelism?
As I have said before, the value of absolute time here is that it allows for the use of server configuration outside of the context of the TLS 1.3 handshake. Given that we are now seriously discussing removing ServerConfiguration from TLS 1.3, this is probably moot. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
