On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Martin Thomson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2 March 2016 at 13:55, Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think a "safer" profile of TLS, as in "implement the following features >> (section XXX, YYY) and not the following (section ZZZ)" then that seems like >> something that might potentially be a useful exercise. Depending on length, >> this might eventually make sense to pull into TLS 1.3 as an appendix or just >> leave as a self-contained document. > > Yeah, something like this would have been very helpful for TCPINC. Or > for protocols like COAP. > > I think that a description of the "good parts" of TLS 1.3 would be a > relatively short document if it were self-contained. The core is > pretty simple. > > Though, as ekr mentioned, copying the main spec could be bad. The > point of something like this is to create something that would talk to > a full implementation, not to create a protocol fork.
I'll make a pull request containing the text against the main document then, and we can see how it looks from there. -- "Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains". --Rousseau. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
