Hi, Martin: We are following the progress of that work. But in principle, any extension to TLS should be done in this group, that is why we raised the discussion in the TLS list. ^_^
Cheers Dacheng 在 16-3-30 下午12:17， "Martin Thomson" <[email protected]> 写入: >On 30 March 2016 at 15:12, Dacheng Zhang <[email protected]> >wrote: >> The charging GW will not authenticate the client, it only needs to be >> informed how the following traffics will be charged, in a trusted way. > > >We've seen this request before. It's not an easy question to answer. > >In short, you want to make information about a flow (meta-information) >available to on-path intermediaries. > >I believe that there is work ongoing in this area. > >draft-you-tsvwg-latency-loss-tradeoff, see >https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/accord/Jsbz-Iatb3WJTuFuvOzkdRrK-uI > >And the upcoming accord BOF. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
