> > Not always; ISO et al. > > That's why I said "basically"; it's a qualifier.
I know; I was trying to emphasize, not correct :). > But keep in mind what kind of stable, publicly available document needs to > be published: a description not of the algorithm but of how that algorithm > get crammed into the TLS exchange That is a good point. But most offerings we have seen so far are about national bulk encryption ciphers and not, say, new key-exchange methods (GOST the only one so far?). Of course that might change. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
