> On 2 Jun 2016, at 10:31 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 15:43 -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: >> 2% is actually pretty good, but I agree that we're going to need >> fallback. > > Please not. Lets let these fallbacks die. Not every client is a > browser. TLS 1.3 must be a protocol which doesn't require hacks to > operate. CBC was removed, lets do the same for insecure fallbacks. Not every client is a browser, but some are. So what does the browser do when a server resets the connection after seeing the ClientHello?
Blank screen with a failure message? _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
