> On 8 Jun 2016, at 10:29 PM, Peter Gutmann <pgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nz> wrote:
> 
> Russ Housley <hous...@vigilsec.com> writes:
> 
>> I do not think the TLS WG should take on any document that makes changes to
>> the TLS 1.2 protocol.
> 
> So how is that different from any number of other TLS standards-track RFCs,

Mostly timing. The TLS working group is now working on TLS 1.3, so 1.2 should 
be considered stable by now. 

We’re not actively developing older versions.

Yoav


_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to