On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 04:37:09 am Martin Thomson wrote: > On 13 June 2016 at 21:27, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> wrote: > > On Mon 2016-06-13 15:00:03 -0400, Joseph Salowey wrote: > > > 1. Use the same key for handshake and application traffic (as in the > > > current draft-13) > > > > > > or > > > > > > 2. Restore a public content type and different keys > > > > Given this choice, i prefer (1). > > +1 > > However... > > I confess that I still haven't properly internalized the objection > from the cryptographers, and that means that I could probably live > with a public content type if more convincing evidence for the value > of 2 could be produced.
+1 _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
