On 21 July 2016 at 18:41, Martin Rex <[email protected]> wrote: > A server that implements this extension MUST NOT accept the request > to resume the session if the server_name extension contains a > different name. Instead, it proceeds with a full handshake to > establish a new session.
If that's the only barrier to doing this, I'd be surprised. The prospect of having to overcome this is not at all daunting. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
