Hi,
The technology is SSL, and is sometimes also refered to as
SSL/TLS.
please no. the technology is TLS.
+
i would like to continue to be able to say unambiguously that all
known versions of SSL are badly broken and should be avoided. Let's
not muddy those waters further.
+
Let's not use a proprietary protocol name for a standard protocol.
Conveniently, all SSL is broken now, long live TLS!
There's still something I find confusing: on the one hand, SSL is badly
broken and "diediedied", it is a proprietary protocol name, and the
consensus in the TLS WG seems to be "long live TLS" but on the other
hand major SSL/TLS implementations keep the SSL name living.
When people look for TLS implementations, they will find OpenSSL,
BoringSSL, LibreSSL, MatrixSSL, wolfSSL, etc.
Besides, a developer will often use "-lssl" to link against TLS libraries.
So, if the consensus is to prevent people who speak about or work on TLS
from constantly viewing the SSL name, will forthcoming software releases
change their name?
Otherwise, confusion keeps being sustained...
--
Julien ÉLIE
« En voyant le lit vide, il le devint. » (Ponson du Terrail)
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
