On 21 September 2016 at 17:21, Andreas Walz
<andreas.w...@hs-offenburg.de> wrote:
> Do you see any argument why ignoring such trailing data would be acceptable
> (or even desirable)?


Well, we exploited that to add extensions to the protocol once, so I
won't categorically rule it out, but in the case of
supported_groups/supported_curves, no good can come of ignoring
rubbish.  Of course, it's hard to point to this being harmful as well

TLS mailing list

Reply via email to