>   This lack of scope, depth and detail [in MITM infrastructures] are what 
> drove us to
> install the packet collection infrastructures (debugging networks I think some
> are saying).

At the risk of repeating myself and flogging this dead horse...  What you are 
doing is exactly what the nation-state actors are doing.  I bet that some even 
use that exact phrase of "packet collection infrastructure." 

I understand that if you want to use TLS 1.3, it is going to be expensive 
and/or inconvenient; you're going to have to educate regulators and get bespoke 
TLS endpoint solutions from vendors. Perhaps you can get the NSA's to stop 
collecting everyone's Internet traffic for future decoding?

Less flippantly, what specifically would you have us do? What do you want in 
the protocol that enables your needs, but doesn't make it possible for everyone 
in the world to be surveilled?  Please, make some specific suggestions.
 

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to