This LGTM. Absent objections I will merge tomorrow On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Hannes Tschofenig < hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net> wrote:
> I gave it a try, see > https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/668/commits/ > 91e5b39e5f0ce62a90effdbaf4e3c90ed0d81245 > > > Ciao > Hannes > > > On 10/10/2016 11:59 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > I agree with MT. Hannes, if you want to clean up the text to take into > > account MT's comments, I will merge > > > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 3:35 AM, Martin Thomson > > <martin.thom...@gmail.com <mailto:martin.thom...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > On 9 September 2016 at 23:37, Hannes Tschofenig > > <hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net <mailto:hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net>> > wrote: > > > I am wondering why I cannot use Zero-RTT with just PSK-based > authentication > > > (without a prior ticket change). > > > > I think that you would need to bind more things to the key in that > > case, but I assume that it would be OK if you did so. You already > > need to pair a PSK with a hash, but if you paired it with a whole > > cipher suite instead and also the ALPN (which could be null), then I > > see no reason not to permit 0-RTT for pure PSK. (I think that cipher > > suite + ALPN is sufficient, but someone can correct me if I missed > > anything.) > > > > _______________________________________________ > > TLS mailing list > > TLS@ietf.org <mailto:TLS@ietf.org> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls> > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
