In CURDLE this week, we had consensus (to be confirmed on the list, of course)
that
Signature contexts were created in the TLS arena, we all thought we
needed them in other areas, and we don't, therefore all CURDLE documents for
those other areas will specify a zero-length context.
FWIW.
I agree with Yoav's message, for the reasons he states.
--
Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
Member, OpenSSL Dev Team
IM: richs...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Turner [mailto:s...@sn3rd.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 6:56 PM
> To: <tls@ietf.org>
> Subject: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis
>
> All,
>
> This is a working group last call for the “4492bis to Standards Track" draft
> available @ http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis/.
> Please
> review the document and send your comments to the list by 9 December
> 2016.
>
> Note that we are particularly interesting in the issue Yoav raises in the
> following message:
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/8Ec7jQqLr_3FrvQfuclllfozKZk
>
> Thanks,
> J&S
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
