I'm very supportive of this draft being adopted. FWIW, I'd love to see similar mechanisms in other protocols as well.
- jana On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Sean Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > > There’s been some interest on the list in http://datatracker.ietf.org/ > doc/draft-davidben-tls-grease/ (aka > Applying Generate Random Extensions And Sustain Extensibility to TLS > Extensibility). We’d like to determine whether there’s enough interest to > adopt the draft as a WG item. So, if you would like for this draft to > become a WG document and you are willing to review various versions as it > moves through the process, then please let the list know by December 21st. > If you are opposed to this being a WG document, please say so (and say why). > > Cheers, > > J&S > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
