Grease away. On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Benjamin Kaduk <bka...@akamai.com> wrote:
> On 01/18/2017 04:49 PM, David Benjamin wrote: > > > Do people agree with this plan? > > > Yes :) > > I've left out psk_key_exchange_modes. It would be nice to GREASE that too, > but it uses u8 rather than u16 values. The natural generalization is to > reserve 0x?a instead of 0x?a?a. But then we lose 16 out of 256 code points, > rather than 16 out of 65536 code points. Do people feel this is an > acceptable tradeoff? Perhaps a smaller pattern? Or is this not worth > bothering with? > > > I feel like we're unlikely to come up with enough modes that we run out of > space, so it is probably okay to grease it. But I would be okay if people > wanted to not do so, too. > > -Ben > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
