On 26 January 2017 at 16:31, Peter Wu <pe...@lekensteyn.nl> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is indeed work in progress, the current state can be tracked at:
> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12779
>
> Note for TLS implementers: Wireshark supports decryption when provided
> with the master secret (TLS 1.2 and before), but with TLS 1.3 there are
> more secrets. The current plan is to accept the client/server
> handshake/application traffic secrets (as opposed to the more sensitive
> Handshake/Master secrets) following the format proposed by BoringSSL:
> https://code.wireshark.org/review/19801

FYI, OpenSSL is also planning to adopt that format:

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2287

Matt



>
> If everything goes well, Wireshark 2.4 should be the first stable
> version with TLS 1.3 support.
>
> Kind regards,
> Peter
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 04:10:00PM +0000, nalini.elk...@insidethestack.com 
> wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> If you want to download a WorkInProgress version of Wireshark that supports 
>> TLS1.3 (latest version of draft -18 only!).   Please go to:
>>
>> https://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/
>>
>> THIS IS NOT THE PRODUCTION VERSION OF WIRESHARK!!!
>>
>> We owe HUGE thanks to Peter Wu & Alexis La Goutte (core Wireshark 
>> developers) for the TLS1.3 dissector.  I did some minor, initial work on the 
>> dissector but it is really their great effort and continued support that is 
>> making this dissector available for us.   Thank you guys so much!!!
>>
>> BTW, we had started an email list to discuss diagnostic & implementation 
>> experiences for TLS.
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-implementers
>>
>> Shall we move to that list to discuss?   Maybe we can share PCAPs.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Nalini Elkins
>> Inside Products, Inc.
>> www.insidethestack.com
>> (831) 659-8360
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to