> On 1 Mar 2017, at 15:06, Aaron Zauner <a...@azet.org> wrote: > > >> On 24 Feb 2017, at 14:07, Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com> wrote: >> >>> Assuming 256-bit AES-CCM suites are needed, I think the better place to put >>> them is in the TLS 1.3 document. >> >> That's a really big assumption. ;) >> >> I think the burden is on folks to *prove* (yeah, I know) that additional >> cipher suites are needed. > > +1. I'm against adding CCM based suites to the TLS 1.3 spec.
Hold on. CCM with a 128-bit key suites are already in the current version of the spec. CCM with a 256-bit key suites are not. Are you advocating just not adding the 256-bit key ciphersuites, or removing those already in? Yoav
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
