On 9 March 2017 at 08:46, Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote: > FWIW, I think DTLS 1.3 should just do this (and other header shortening > stuff). > I don't know of any evidence that there are policy enforcement boxes for > DTLS
Definitely. I also think that DTLS 1.3 could stand to lose a few sequence number and epoch octets at the same time. We have some lessons from QUIC that will help there (for instance, we only need to signal three epoch values, and two octets of sequence number space is probably too lean). _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
