> On Mar 23, 2017, at 11:53 AM, Melinda Shore <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the thorough review, Viktor. I'll get the straightforward
> bits into the draft over the weekend and plan on discussing the ones
> proposing changes to the extension or to chain construction and
> processing in the working group session.
It seems to me that the TLS bits of the draft are close to done and
relatively simple to finish. Perhaps at this point the reviews the
draft needs are more likely to be found in the DNSOP than the TLSWG.
Is there precedent for doing two working group last calls, one in
the TLS WG to confirm that the TLS bits are done, and then another
in DNSOP to go over the details of the DNS bits, and only then
proceed to IETF LC?
I don't know how many other folks on the TLS WG list are prepared
to do a thorough review the DNSSEC aspects of this draft...
Perhaps the TLS and DNS communities overlap sufficiently that my
concern is not warranted?
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
