Draft submitted (it should be identical to the individual submission)

-Ekr


On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Sean Turner <[email protected]> wrote:

> It’s now the 7th so the call for adoption is complete.  Though Ben was the
> only commenter on list (and thanks Ben) there was definitely support for
> adopting this draft at the Chicago session.  This bit of administrivia is
> complete so authors feel free to submit a WG version at your leisure.  I’ve
> pre-approved "draft-ietf-tls-dtls13" as the draft's name and created a
> github repo: https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec.
>
> spt
>
> > On Mar 22, 2017, at 18:50, Sean Turner <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > -00 of draft-rescorla-tls-dtls13 [0][1] was discussed at IETF 97 [2].
> It’s now at version -01 and GH issues are slowly rolling in.  It’s also on
> our agenda again at IETF 98, and DTLS a chartered work item, so it seems
> like it’s time to get the WG adoption process started for this individual
> draft.  Please let the list know whether you support adoption of the draft
> and are willing to review/comment on the draft before 20170406.  If you
> object to its adoption, please let us know why.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > J&S
> >
> > [0] https://github.com/ekr/dtls13-spec
> > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-rescorla-tls-dtls13
> > [2] https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/slides/slides-
> 97-tls-dtls-13-01.pdf
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to