I haven't approved it yet as I noticed there was no response (that I saw) to Alexey's comment and no change in the draft as a result of his comments.
I'll wait in responses for these 2 items. Thank you, Kathleen Sent from my iPhone > On May 4, 2017, at 8:41 AM, Hubert Kario <hka...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Tuesday, 11 April 2017 15:09:04 CEST Sean Turner wrote: >> All, >> >> draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis has been revised since it left the WG and we agree >> with Yoav’s statement at the mic in Chicago that the WG should review the >> changes before we ask Kathleen (our newly appointed AD) to continue >> progressing the draft. Please review the differences from the -12 version >> that went through WGLC and the latest version [0] and let us know by >> 20170426 whether there is anything that would stop progression of the >> draft. > > I know I am late with the review, but I'd like to ask two questions: > > 1. In table 2, the "key authorised for use in digital signatures" was > removed. > Does that mean that key usage extension in X.509 certificates should be > ignored? > 2. Given that RFC7919 is already accepted, standards track document, > shouldn't "NamedCurve" references be renamed to "NamedGroup" (e.g. in > Section 5.5.1.) > > -- > Regards, > Hubert Kario > Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team > Web: www.cz.redhat.com > Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
