Feel better Jason! -----Original Message----- From: TLS [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Salz, Rich Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2017 10:58 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Natasha Rooney <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [TLS] trusted_ca_keys
> There is some wording in PKIX and X.509 which creates the impression > that a CA could be re-using the same Subject DName with different > keys, but such an interpretation is a formally provable defect of the PKIX > specification. Any links you can point to? I don't see how CA1 issuing a sub-ca for "... CN=fred" can globally prevent CA2 from issuing a sub-ca with the exact same DN. Can you explain what I am missing? _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls The information contained in this communication is highly confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom this communication is directed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. Please notify the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended receipt and delete the original message without making any copies. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Blue Care Network of Michigan are nonprofit corporations and independent licensees of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
