>I've seen a number of arguments here that essentially boil down to "We'd like >to keep it anyway, because it is so operationally convenient". Is that really >how this process works? Don't demonstrable real-world attacks deserve >deference?
Well it's a little more subtle then that; folks seem to acknowledge the attacks but feel that their use-cases won't be affected. I'm looking at you, Chrome, boring, Firefox :) Don't get discouraged. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
